The article analyses the educational-didactic level of the sermons by the late 19th century priest and Lithuanian writer Juozas Tumas-Vaižgantas. The target of the sermons is the community, whose value orientation and morality must be developed. A sermon as a religious discourse enables the orator not only to comment on the Word of God revealed in the Holy Scriptures, and to explain the truths of the faith, but also, with the help of these truths, to achieve pragmatic goals: to educate, teach and provide practical knowledge. The study focuses on the category of conscience, as determining the moral decisions of an individual and having the power to influence his thoughts and feelings. The problem and the main goal of the article is to find out how this special human ability to distinguish good from evil is measured and understood by Vaižgantas himself, what role he gives it in the process of the individual’s moral education, and how his perceived conscience and its meaning correlate with the texts of the Holy Scriptures. The sermons preached by J. Tumas-Vaižgantas in Mintauja in 1894 were selected for the study. During the analysis, it became clear that for the preacher, the conscience is not only the final authority of morality, which must be obeyed unconditionally, but also that the close relationship between the conscience and faith is important. Discussing the educational role of the conscience, Vaižgantas emphasises the need to form a clear conscience.
2016 m. kovo 31 – balandžio 1 d. teko dalyvauti tarptautinėje mokslinėje konferencijoje „Objektyvumas etikoje“ (Objectivity in Ethics), kurią surengė Utrechto universiteto (Nyderlandai) Filosofijos ir religijos studijų katedra. Mokslinio komiteto vadovas, Utrechto universiteto filosofijos garbės profesorius dr. Herman Phillipse, pradėdamas renginį, pristatė esmingiausius aspektus ir problemas, kurios turėjo būti aptartos konferencijoje. Profesoriaus nuomone, dauguma iš mūsų sutinka, kad moralinės normos ir imperatyvai yra objektyvesni už estetinius vertinimus arba skonio taisykles. Nors kasdieniai moraliniai sprendimai vertinami kaip objektyvūs ir nepriklausomi nuo kieno nors asmeninių troškimų ir polinkių, tačiau filosofai nesutaria beveik dėl visų etikos objektyvumo aspektų. Rimta problema H. Phillipse įvardijo moralinių ypatybių nepritaikomumą mokslu grindžiamai žmogaus pasaulėžiūrai. Todėl, akcentavo profesorius, konferencijos tikslas – ištyrinėti filosofinių požiūrių dėl moralės objektyvumo įvairovę ir įvertinti šių požiūrių pagrįstumą. Objektyvumo klausimas moralės paradigmoje yra itin aktualus dėl individo sąmonės struktūros sudėtingumo ir nevienodų jį supančios aplinkos percepcijos galimybių.
Motiejus Valančius paid attention to the depiction of the relationship between a man and a woman (husband and wife) in his didactic creative work. The main aim of the Bishop of Samogitia was to educate people in the spirit of religion and morality. In Valančius‘ opinion, a good relationship between spouses is determined by equality between a man and a woman, cooperation, and equal responsibility for the children‘s upbringing. For this reason, the compatibility of social-caste, cultural and religious features between both spouses is important. The report reveals how Valančius created didactic precepts in order to create a harmonious relationship between a man and a woman.
The article seeks to emphasize peculiarity of reception of the oeuvre of Prussian Lithuanian philosopher and writer Vydūnas. The author represents analysis of the literary polemic between Lithuanian writers Balys Sruoga and Julijonas Lindė-Dobilas. This polemic arose from B. Sruoga’s sharp review written for Vydūnas’s mystery play Jūrų varpai. Subsequently Vydūnas involves himself in to polemic with B. Sruoga which developed into direct literary controversy. The article discusses not only question about intricacy of Vydūnas’s works but seeks to answer the question: why B. Sruoga rejects professional critical evaluation of the play and insistently holds an opinion that Vidūnas’s oeuvre is unacceptable for Lithuanian reader. The article also introduces how after a few years changed B. Sruoga’s attitude in respect to Vydūnas’s personality and his oeuvre.