<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">TBB</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Tiltai</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2351-6569</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1392-3137</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>KU</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">05_TILVIKAS</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15181/tbb.v88i1.2411</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>LIAUDIES MEDICINOS SAMPRATOS DISKURSAS  SOCIALINĖS APLINKOS, ISTORIŠKUMO,  MOKSLIŠKUMO KATEGORIJŲ KONTEKSTUOSE</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Tilvikas</surname>
            <given-names>Jonas</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:href="mailto:skliutas@gmail.com">skliutas@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">∗</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor1"><label>∗</label>Corresponding author.</corresp>
      </author-notes>
      <volume>88</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>63</fpage>
      <lpage>79</lpage>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>24</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <permissions>
        <ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>The article presents the discourse of folk medicine concepts in contexts of historicity, the social environment, and scientificity category interfaces. One of the essential features of folk medicine is its intra-disciplinary nature, necessitating basing the already-mentioned categories on a context analysis of theoretical and practical approaches to folk medicine. The article consists of four parts, which correspond to the approaches of discourse analysis on the concept of folk medicine. The first part presents the anthropological evaluation of folk medicine approaches to the social environment, historicity and scientificity. The second part highlights the context of the historicity of folk medicine, which raises the question whether folk medicine is an endangered legacy or a changing tradition? The third part analyses the expression of folk medicine in approaches to the coverage of the social environment: from village to city, from nation to humanity. The fourth part leads to an evaluation of the interfaces between folk medicine and scientificity as a problem of rationality/irrationality. In conclusion, it is emphasised that by presenting the discourse of folk medicine concepts in the already-mentioned segments (social environment, historicity, scientificity), folk medicine’s theoretical and practical expression is evaluated in contexts of today’s and past experiences.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>folk medicine</kwd>
        <kwd>social environment</kwd>
        <kwd>historicity</kwd>
        <kwd>scientificity</kwd>
        <kwd>anthropology</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
