<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">TBB</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Tiltai</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1392-3137</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1392-3137</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>KU</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1053-3947-1-PB</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15181/tbb.v69i1.1053</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>NEAPIBRĖŽTUMO ASPEKTAI SOCIALINIAME DARBE</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="Author">
          <name>
            <surname>Rimkus</surname>
            <given-names>Valdas</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:href="mailto:valdasrim@gmail.com">valdasrim@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">∗</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor1"><label>∗</label>Corresponding author.</corresp>
      </author-notes>
      <volume>70</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>99</fpage>
      <lpage>114</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>The article addresses the problem of uncertainty in social work. The problem is analyzed in the context of domination of postmodern worldviews. Three types of uncertainty are distinguished: ontological, epistemological and procedural. Resting on various literature critical thinking, human rights discourse and client strengths perspective are presented as possible alternatives for decision making in a complex world.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>uncertainty</kwd>
        <kwd>complexity</kwd>
        <kwd>postmodernism</kwd>
        <kwd>social work</kwd>
        <kwd>human rights</kwd>
        <kwd>critical thinking</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
