<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RFDS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Regional Formation and Development Studies</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2351-6542</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2029-9370</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>KU</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">14_SVAZE</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15181/rfds.v49i2.2821</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Evolution of Theoretical Models of Employee Engagement: from Instrumental Effectiveness to a Holistic Psychological Well-Being Approach</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Švažė</surname>
            <given-names>Dovilė</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:href="mailto:dovile.svaze@ku.lt">dovile.svaze@ku.lt</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_RFDS_aff_000"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_RFDS_aff_000">Klaipėda University</aff>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Stašys</surname>
            <given-names>Rimantas</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:href="mailto:rimantas.stasys@ku.lt">rimantas.stasys@ku.lt</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_RFDS_aff_001"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_RFDS_aff_001">Klaipėda University</aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <volume>49</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>181</fpage>
      <lpage>192</lpage>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>02</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <permissions>
        <ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>Although employee engagement has dominated management practice for several decades, the scientific discussion still encounters</p>
        <p>the fragmentation of the construct. This article examines the transformation of the concept of employee engagement, from early</p>
        <p>notions of organisational effectiveness to modern complex multi-dimensional constructs. A systematic analysis of scientific sources</p>
        <p>revealed that the concept of engagement has evolved from a limited, results-oriented approach to a holistic (full engagement) model.</p>
        <p>The review highlights fundamental theoretical frameworks, including the job demands-resources model, social exchange theory,</p>
        <p>and the caring human resource management approach. The lack of consensus indicates the complexity of the phenomenon under</p>
        <p>investigation, and contemporary trends emphasise the need to align organisational goals with employees’ personal needs and values.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>employee engagement</kwd>
        <kwd>job demands-resources model</kwd>
        <kwd>social exchange theory</kwd>
        <kwd>psychological well-being</kwd>
        <kwd>human resource management</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="JEL CODES">
        <label>JEL CODES</label>
        <kwd>M12</kwd>
        <kwd>M54</kwd>
        <kwd>J28</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
